EconDefense
IND-50 / Property, construction and housing

Exchange military land for other property or qualifying acquisition

Trade real property for other land/interests or encroachment-mitigation acquisition; an expanded services/facility exchange pilot depends on its guidance-triggered window.

Download record

At a glance

Possible toolIND-50 · Property & leases

Authority holder: Secretary concerned

Property & leasesCooperation & exchanges

Mechanism tags describe the source text; they do not expand the authority.

Availability and verification

Core land-exchange route conditional and extant; expanded services/facility pilot currentness unresolved pending guidance date.

Requirements and limits

Eligibility & prerequisites

  • Advantage-to-U.S. or applicable BRAC property
  • Equivalent fair-market value or cash equalization, subject to narrow zoning exception
  • Public and congressional notice;14or45day statutory wait

Limits & exclusions

  • BRAC exchanges consistent with redevelopment plan
  • Services/new-facility exchange is eight-year pilot from guidance issuance; current window not established here

Funding conditions

  • Property-value exchange; equalization receipts to specified foreign-currency-fluctuation construction appropriation, subject to appropriation rules.

Read the funding and execution guide

Who contributes what

Need & planning

  • Installation commander and Service facilities/real-estate staff
  • Service installation secretariat / ASD(EI&E) policy

Resources

  • Military Department installation budgets / project sponsor

Approval

  • Secretary concerned or properly delegated real-estate/construction official

Execution

  • USACE district real-estate/construction offices
  • NAVFAC real-estate and facilities engineering commands
  • AFCEC installations/facility engineering directorates

Partners & review

  • Landowners / developers / local governments
  • Environmental regulators and real-estate counsel

Office links are editorial matches to the original role text, not verified delegations. Composite labels and unmatched actors are preserved.

Coordination pathway

Requirement sponsor → named planning office → resource owner and counsel → statutory approving official → authorized executing/contracting office.

Actor and execution-role sources

What this research establishes

Legal powerSource and conditions recorded
EligibilityProject-specific check needed
Available fundsBalances not verified
DelegationValid signature authority must be checked
ExecutionOffice capacity and approvals must be checked

Confidence: High on statutory permission; execution roles are organizational routing, not verified individual delegations.

Currentness: 2024 official U.S. Code operative text read; relevant amendments in Pub. L. 119-60 (Dec. 18, 2025), 119-21 and 119-103 examined. Rolling OLRC source consulted where retrievable; transaction-specific later-law and delegation confirmation remains necessary.

Research target: October 2, 2026. A record-specific last-review date is not supplied. Publication date is not legal-currentness certification.