EconDefense
ACQ-48 / Research, innovation and experimentation

Conduct COCOM experiments and make findings supporting transition

Each combatant commander can conduct experimentation, prototyping and technology demonstrations addressing command operational needs and support acquisition with written operational-need findings.

Authority / instrument · ACQ-48

COCOM experimentation

Research, innovation and experimentation

Statute & instrument
Authority holder

Each combatant commander; senior contracting official retains applicable award role

What this does not authorize / hard limit

Completion determination may fulfill listed justification/capability-need requirements; not waiver of all §3204 approvals or fiscal conditions.

Recorded executor

Command experiment team with supporting contracting/research organizations

Continue to actor →

Recorded executing role; this record-specific route is not an additional institutional office.

Legal basisSources linkedLegal sources and instrument limits are recorded.
RequirementsGates recordedRead the requirements for this instrument; applicability depends on the proposed action.
Public fundingRules recordedAuthority does not create a command-wide discretionary appropriation; identify lawful available funding and transition customer. Office budget figures are separate institutional context, not an allocation to this instrument.
Assigned rolesRoles recordedPublic sources describe institutional authority. The instrument identifies approval and execution roles; a specific signature remains transaction-dependent.
EngagementProgram unverifiedA commander-level experimentation power is enacted, but this research did not verify a public implementing procedure or award expressly using section 873. Program check: 2026-10-04; see each route for intake status.

Public evidence describes the institution and instrument; it is not approval of an individual transaction.

At a glance

Possible toolACQ-48 · Other statutory tools

Authority holder: Each combatant commander; senior contracting official retains applicable award role

Other statutory tools

Mechanism tags describe the source text; they do not expand the authority.

Availability and verification

Express statutory pathway; award-specific appropriations, available balances, delegations, implementation and approvals not independently verified.

Program process and intake

Checked 2026-10-04 · implementation not verified. Program evidence is separate from legal authority, available funds and transaction approval.

A commander-level experimentation power is enacted, but this research did not verify a public implementing procedure or award expressly using section 873.

Combatant-command experimentation authority

Who this route serves
Government operational sponsors; performers through an identified solicitation
Administering office / routing lead
Combatant commander and responsible senior contracting official
Unverified

Section 873 grants command experimentation authority and conditionally permits section 843 procedures. Neither fact establishes that a named exercise uses those authorities.

What this evidence label means
Authority enacted; attributed use unverified

No public award, delegation or intake specifically attributed to section 873 was located.

Status reference date: 2026-10-04 · research checked 2026-10-04

FY2026 NDAA combatant-command experimentation · Section873statute · published 2025-12-18 · Evidence record

Program eligibility

Steps and preparation

Funding, limits and authority relationship

Funding and financial terms

Exclusions and limits

Authority relationship source

FY2026 NDAA combatant-command experimentation · Section873statute · published 2025-12-18 · Evidence record

Read section873 conditions →

published guidance: Statutory reference; not a verified submission portal.

Research scope and sources checked

Searched exact section/name across military sites and public notices, legislative texts and official command experimentation references. Generic exercises and professional commentary did not establish a873 tie and were excluded.

What remains unverified

  • Search command-specific solicitations for explicit873 authority and verify current delegation/appropriation before linking a transaction.

A dated source check is not continuing monitoring. Recheck the linked official notice before preparing a submission. Browse program research →

Requirements and limits

Eligibility & prerequisites

  • Technology/capability solution addresses command-identified operational need.
  • §843 special contracting procedures must be followed when used.

Limits & exclusions

  • Completion determination may fulfill listed justification/capability-need requirements; not waiver of all §3204 approvals or fiscal conditions.
  • Sunset 2028-09-30.

Funding conditions

  • Authority does not create a command-wide discretionary appropriation; identify lawful available funding and transition customer.

Read the funding and execution guide

Who contributes what

Need & planning

  • Combatant commander and innovation/experimentation staff

Resources

  • Command or supporting component available project funds

Approval

  • Commander; senior contracting official and applicable acquisition approver

Execution

  • Command experiment team with supporting contracting/research organizations

Partners & review

Office links are editorial matches to the original role text, not verified delegations. Composite labels and unmatched actors are preserved.

Coordination pathway

COCOM need and resource sponsor → experiment/prototype instrument → commander operational determination → senior contracting official and Service/customer funded transition.

Actor and execution-role sources

What this research establishes

Legal basisSources linkedLegal sources and instrument limits are recorded.
RequirementsGates recordedRead the requirements for this instrument; applicability depends on the proposed action.
Public fundingRules recordedAuthority does not create a command-wide discretionary appropriation; identify lawful available funding and transition customer. Office budget figures are separate institutional context, not an allocation to this instrument.
Assigned rolesRoles recordedPublic sources describe institutional authority. The instrument identifies approval and execution roles; a specific signature remains transaction-dependent.
EngagementProgram unverifiedA commander-level experimentation power is enacted, but this research did not verify a public implementing procedure or award expressly using section 873. Program check: 2026-10-04; see each route for intake status.

Confidence: High on express authority and cited conditions; execution assignment is illustrative unless statute expressly names it.

Currentness: P.L. 119-60 §873 read directly; authority expires 2028-09-30.

Review scope: Original research target October 2, 2026; no record-specific last-review date supplied. Publication is not legal-currentness certification.