EconDefense
IND-44 / Energy, environment and communities

Cost-share buffers, easements, water rights and resilience with partners

REPI-type agreements acquire willing-seller interests and support habitat, encroachment avoidance and installation resilience; can match other federal conservation/resilience programs.

Authority / instrument · IND-44

Mission-compatible land conservation

Energy, environment and communities

Statute & instrument
Authority holder

Secretary of Defense or military department

What this does not authorize / hard limit

Not compulsory conservation taking

Recorded executor

USACE district real-estate/construction offices; NAVFAC real-estate and facilities engineering commands; AFCEC installations/facility engineering directorates

Continue to actor →

Recorded executing role; this record-specific route is not an additional institutional office.

Legal basisSources linkedLegal sources and instrument limits are recorded.
RequirementsGates recordedRead the requirements for this instrument; applicability depends on the proposed action.
Public fundingRules recordedO&M, or RDT&E for primarily RDT&E installations, as expressly permitted; partner match and long-term management terms documented. Office budget figures are separate institutional context, not an allocation to this instrument.
Assigned rolesRoles recordedPublic sources describe institutional authority. The instrument identifies approval and execution roles; a specific signature remains transaction-dependent.
EngagementProcess sourcedREPI offers an authority-specific, installation-coordinated cost-sharing route; the 2027 Challenge preproposal deadline has already passed. Program check: 2026-10-04; see each route for intake status.

Public evidence describes the institution and instrument; it is not approval of an individual transaction.

At a glance

Possible toolIND-44 · Property & leases

Authority holder: Secretary of Defense or military department

Property & leases

Mechanism tags describe the source text; they do not expand the authority.

Availability and verification

Conditional legal pathway; current funding, required determinations, and actual delegation not certified.

Program process and intake

Checked 2026-10-04 · program documented. Program evidence is separate from legal authority, available funds and transaction approval.

REPI offers an authority-specific, installation-coordinated cost-sharing route; the 2027 Challenge preproposal deadline has already passed.

Readiness and Environmental Protection Integration / REPI Challenge

Who this route serves
Eligible government, conservation and other partners under the chosen statutory authority
Administering office / routing lead
OSD REPI Program under installations/environment leadership, with Military Service and installation partners
Direct implementation

The RFP names § 2684a directly, alongside separate § 2679 and Sikes Act authority; these routes must not be treated as identical.

What this evidence label means
Published preproposal deadline passed

Preproposals for the 2027 Challenge were due July 2, 2026 at 8 p.m. Eastern; later invitation status was not established.

Status reference date: 2026-10-04 · research checked 2026-10-04

REPI Challenge:2027 competition · 2027 RFP release, eligible entities and July 2, 2026 preproposal deadlineofficial program/competition page · Evidence record

Program eligibility

  • Projects must protect mission capability through compatible land use, habitat/environmental relief or installation resilience; eligibility depends on the authority selected.

    2027 REPI Challenge Request for Proposals · Printed p.1, Goal and Background; § 2684a/§ 2679/§ 670c-1 authority listofficial funding solicitation · Evidence record

Steps and preparation

  • Coordinate with the installation and submit through the Challenge Portal according to the cycle instructions.

    REPI Challenge:2027 competition · 2027 RFP release, eligible entities and July 2, 2026 preproposal deadlineofficial program/competition page · Evidence record
Funding, limits and authority relationship

Funding and financial terms

  • announced competition amount · 2027 cycle

    2027 RFP states up to$20 million may be provided; this is prospective competition funding, not a present award.

    2027 REPI Challenge Request for Proposals · Printed p.1, Goal and Background; § 2684a/§ 2679/§ 670c-1 authority listofficial funding solicitation · Evidence record
  • announced awards/partner leverage · 2026 cycle

    2026 recipients were announced with over$20 million REPI funding and over$43 million partner contributions.

    REPI program current announcements · 2026 REPI Challenge funding recipients; program administrationofficial program status page · Evidence record

Exclusions and limits

Authority relationship source

2027 REPI Challenge Request for Proposals · Printed p.1, Goal and Background; § 2684a/§ 2679/§ 670c-1 authority listofficial funding solicitation · Evidence record

REPI Challenge requirements and portal links →

competition information: The July 2, 2026 preproposal round is closed by its published deadline; next-stage invitation or future cycle must be verified.

Source access and verification notes
Research scope and sources checked

Searched currentREPI cycles and exact2684a linkage; distinguished announced2026 awards from prospective2027 funding and dated preproposal intake.

What remains unverified

  • Full invitation-stage deadline, site-specific service approval and exact cost-share terms were not verified; direct PDF/page access was blocked despite rich official indexed text.

A dated source check is not continuing monitoring. Recheck the linked official notice before preparing a submission. Browse program research →

Requirements and limits

Eligibility & prerequisites

  • Eligible government or conservation partner
  • Mission compatibility and owner consent
  • Fair-market-value/federal-share conditions with specific excess-value notice exception

Limits & exclusions

  • Not compulsory conservation taking
  • Only mission-related scope; interests must protect statutory purpose

Funding conditions

  • O&M, or RDT&E for primarily RDT&E installations, as expressly permitted; partner match and long-term management terms documented.

Read the funding and execution guide

Who contributes what

Need & planning

  • Installation commander and Service facilities/real-estate staff
  • Service installation secretariat / ASD(EI&E) policy

Resources

  • Military Department installation budgets / project sponsor

Approval

  • Secretary concerned or properly delegated real-estate/construction official

Execution

  • USACE district real-estate/construction offices
  • NAVFAC real-estate and facilities engineering commands
  • AFCEC installations/facility engineering directorates

Partners & review

  • Landowners / developers / local governments
  • Environmental regulators and real-estate counsel

Office links are editorial matches to the original role text, not verified delegations. Composite labels and unmatched actors are preserved.

Coordination pathway

Requirement sponsor → named planning office → resource owner and counsel → statutory approving official → authorized executing/contracting office.

Actor and execution-role sources

What this research establishes

Legal basisSources linkedLegal sources and instrument limits are recorded.
RequirementsGates recordedRead the requirements for this instrument; applicability depends on the proposed action.
Public fundingRules recordedO&M, or RDT&E for primarily RDT&E installations, as expressly permitted; partner match and long-term management terms documented. Office budget figures are separate institutional context, not an allocation to this instrument.
Assigned rolesRoles recordedPublic sources describe institutional authority. The instrument identifies approval and execution roles; a specific signature remains transaction-dependent.
EngagementProcess sourcedREPI offers an authority-specific, installation-coordinated cost-sharing route; the 2027 Challenge preproposal deadline has already passed. Program check: 2026-10-04; see each route for intake status.

Confidence: High on statutory permission; execution roles are organizational routing, not verified individual delegations.

Currentness: 2024 official U.S. Code operative text read; relevant amendments in Pub. L. 119-60 (Dec. 18, 2025), 119-21 and 119-103 examined. Rolling OLRC source consulted where retrievable; transaction-specific later-law and delegation confirmation remains necessary.

Review scope: Original research target October 2, 2026; no record-specific last-review date supplied. Publication is not legal-currentness certification.